The hot seat
On Saturday i was coming into Colombo from Wattala to attend a wedding with a few friends. There was a major traffic jam and we were consequently stuck on the road for quite some time. The reason being of course that His Excellency the President of Sri Lanka was on his way to receive some rare (read: probably obscure) honor for his efforts for providing us with freedom.
There are talks of new taxes being imposed. Apparently there is also a seatbelt fine. You get fined if you don't wear your seatbelt. From what i heard its somewhere like 2000 rupees per offense and repeat offenders get to go directly to the courts. Sri Lankans are notorious for not wearing seatbelts so this should net the government a handy sum if imposed and acted upon.
Im curious, is it cos i don't know of these things or is there really no mechanism that lets the public be aware of the rationale behind new legislation and policy stances? Ideally there should be reasearch studies out about frequencies and causes of road accidents to support the seatbelt tax. What i think happened was that some smart alec minister came up with a good 'suggestion' to find some fast cash without the public getting too pissed off. I mean hey, we can all keep our seatbelts on if we don't want to pay yeah. And most of the voter base doesn't really own cars anyway.
The Military
The army is expanding. I heard from the Armchair Warrior Grapevine that this is necessary to secure the area. More soldiers are apparently required to secure an area than to fight it. Maybe i can see the sense in that. Seeing as the LTTE seem to be regrouping now, but still it doesn't look like the taxes are going to subside becuse of this. Also, for the suparlative and the trivia fan, the Sri Lankan military apparently will be the 10th largest in the world if the expansion is carried out.
This also ties into the IDP issue; the government is insistent on holding them for at least 2 to 3 years while international pressure, for what its worth, keeps insisting they let them go. Reports of opressive paramilitary activities at IDP camps abounded and were pretty morbid. But living conditions have now improved according to the IDMC. The government insists it needs to 'weed out' possible tiger cadres hiding within around 300,000 IDPs in vaious camps in the North East and they have just released about 2000 people who have been camped for about two years now.
Our GDP may sink. As defense ependiture reduces the contribution of government expenditure. Although development may pick it up. I read in the Times that there is a 50 million dollar resort of a number of boutique hotels coming up. Hopefully more development will happen and help us with our forex problems which brings us to,
The Economy
Economy wise we seem to have reached a firmer footing. According to this LBO article our balance of payments crisis which was formed by the CBs soft peg is somewhat over. It happened when they sold what dollars they had to buy back rupees to keep up the rupee exchange rates, perhaps helping temper the cost of war imports. What they also did though, was to print more rupees at the same time, defeating the purpose of the peg. Thereby needing even more dollars to fund the thing and avoid a major currency collapse.
I guess they were gambling it all on the war being over, and it's paid off. There has been some foreign inflow and the government has even pulled of a US bond sale which was oversubscribed by about a 100%. Assertions that the need for that IMF loan have lessened seem a bit credible now. There is investment coming in and development projects in line for the liberated territories especially. Although i am not clear as to how much corruption and inefficiency will stunt it.
Industry seems to be suffering with a lot of jobs being lost in the recent spate of downsizing that hit the garment field and other industries. Foreign remittances are also on the decline and many workers are having to return home.
There are signs that fuel prices may be on the rise, with LIOC lobbying for a price increase, the government has insisted it is not planning on raising prices but that is a regular government tactic to calm the people before they go ahead and increase the prices overnight. As was seen in the past.
Interest rates need to be lowered. There is a reluctance by most banks to do this, the current environment still being favourable for high interest rates, but lending has frozen somewhat and domestic demand needs to be stimulated. There are already efforts to get this underway.
What next?
Overall, I feel the outlook is lukewarm. Im not by nature an optimist. But i'm not too pessimistic about our future either. The end of the war is widely speculated to stimulate interest in investments especially in the North East and this will have spillover effects on the rest of the country as well.
If i am a little skeptical, it is with regard to the country's leadership and direction, will they handle the redevelopment efficiently? And also the environment of suppression of free expression that is prevailing right now is a cause for concern. We need a more independent media capable of pulling up those in charge without fear of repercussions. Someone needs to monitor the monitors afterall.
Sri Lanka: The state of play
1:29 PM
|
Labels:
Business,
Economy,
Politics,
post-war,
Sri Lanka
|
This entry was posted on 1:29 PM
and is filed under
Business
,
Economy
,
Politics
,
post-war
,
Sri Lanka
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
the seatbelt thing is more a fine than a tax no?
"What i think happened was that some smart alec minister came up with a good 'suggestion' to find some fast cash without the public getting too pissed off. I mean hey, we can all keep our seatbelts on if we don't want to pay yeah."
that's pretty much how most of our policies are made. either someone spots a quick buck making scheme or someone decides he's all knowing and comes up with a hare-brained policy eg: the policy that was going to stop all women with children younger than 5 years from going abroad to work.
spot on pp, can't believe i got that wrong. thanks, iv done the corrections..
and re the policies. its pretty depressing isnt it? and only reason i can think of for the unavailability of concrete backup communication of research for polices etc is because the public does not demand it.
Ok this theory might be far off,
But the reason why all these nuisance fines are to impose strict discipline in society. This would provide a government with much needed backing to move ahead with unpopular changes with less opposition.
We can see some of those being allowed already. One good example is the Private Medical Schools, i dont know if MR would later oppose it, but as of now the government is freely allowing the Russian med school in Malabe to operate with its intake already being commenced.
The student unions cannot strongly oppose and even if they do it would not deter public opinion, this was not the case some years ago.
Also im sure there will be strong discouragement on Alcohol and Tobacco in the future(if whats there isnt already enough!)
All this summed up would impose strict discipline on a society and ultimately the country can be mobilized the way the government want to.
i dunno rsz. i can't say i agree with you. the backing to move with changes comes in the form of the mandate the government gets. if the change is unpopular, chances are the majority of the people are against it, what'd you say?
in the case of the medical schools, i think the reason we hear of opposition in the form of student unions is more because they are louder and than because they're the majority.
i have a lot of trouble agreeing with your last sentence. a democratic government should mobilise the country in the way the people want to. what you say makes me think more of a dictatorship than a democracy.
whack, communicating research to influence policy is a global movement. unfortunately in sl, the policy making environment is not one which values research very much. policy influencing is actually insanely hard.
funny how most of the things that are wrong with the country boils down to "because the people don't demand it" eh?
Talk about it. But what RSZ says does have an aminous ring to it. The government just may be able to coax the majority into doing what it wants, by convincing it that that is what is needed, I.e. a lifestyle where there is no alcohol and drugs and where everyone lives in 'peace and harmony'. The very nature of the Sri Lankan public may open them to being 'dupable'. The people don't demand much after all eh
Post a Comment