tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1060561507530276380.post7302519226741958467..comments2023-11-05T17:36:25.115+05:30Comments on Going Global: Fear FactorTheWhacksteRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16163713209619543202noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1060561507530276380.post-17799606794611177512009-05-26T19:29:22.659+05:302009-05-26T19:29:22.659+05:30First of all im sorry for taking so long to reply!...First of all im sorry for taking so long to reply!<br /><br />Well yes you're right rational man is sufficient for most macro level analyses. <br /><br />But as we get more and more micro in terms of what we look at and look at trends that influence behaviour this concept will need to be re-looked at. Just like the earth i guess.<br /><br />I'll check out the logic of life. thanks..TheWhacksteRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16163713209619543202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1060561507530276380.post-76585920151600811782009-05-13T00:16:00.000+05:302009-05-13T00:16:00.000+05:30I'd recommend the Logic of Life .
As a side note,...I'd recommend <A HREF="http://deaned.blogspot.com/2008/07/on-logic-of-life-review.html" REL="nofollow">the Logic of Life </A>.<br /><br />As a side note, no good economist really argues that man is always and everywhere rational being. The question you must ask is whether treating as if man was rational being produces good-enough results and an accurate-enough way of seeing and understanding Deanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11858835286985736348noreply@blogger.com